Here is the tl;dr version first. To see all of Pigsty Ville you have to pay to join the group. Unfortunately the owner of the group is a fruitcake who will assume you are an alt of somebody who is out to get him. So you could be banned without warning due to his paranoia, losing your money in the process.
Pigsty Ville is a sim in SL which caters to every perversion. It is a truly filthy place, much of it does turn my stomach. It's not my bag, having said that it looks wonderful. It is probably the best looking adult sim I have seen. And that is why I not only decided to make it my #1 place to hang out, but also decided to get involved when Marlon.Ganloso, the owner started talking to me.
It wasn't just that it was a great looking sim and that Marlon is a nice guy, but he also told me that some of the other sims were out to fuck with him and close him down. He did say at the time, "Some people think I am paranoid..." and I did think he was being a bit paranoid, but I am a sucker for the underdog and decided to help him draw traffic to the site. I became the hostess there and spent a few days playing meet-and-greet.
The more he talked to me, the more he let me know about his suspicions. I concluded he did have a touch of paranoia and it was probably only a matter of time before he had a falling out with me.
Well, it took less than a week. He accused my Linn of being an alter of his ex-girlfriend (You have no idea how absurd that is) and the more reasons I gave him as to why she couldn't... lets just say that no matter what I said, he found a pattern in it that linked Linn to his ex-girlfriend and other alts. By the time he called me a bitch and took away my sim-rights I was pretty confident paranoid schizophrenia was the cause of his suspicions.
It is wrong to mock the afflicted and despite a breakdown in our relationship I decided I wanted to stay on the sim. And he seems like a nice guy... I thought he would calm down, snap out of it, and I would carry on as normal. I thought that if I was stable, sane, unchanging, I might be the one person he trusts even during an episode and I might be able to get him to seek help.
Unfortunately Ophelia logged in overnight and he banned and muted her amidst a load of abuse in German. Then he did the same to me when I logged in, then he did the same to Linn. It seems that overnight he brooded on the issue and decided that we were all out to get him.
Having spent a week as his confidant, I can tell you he suspected just about everybody who came on the sim as being an alt, and I kept telling him, "Even if they are alts, they are giving you traffic, they can't harm you, leave them alone!". I can only wonder how many people he does kick/ban from the sim, but I no longer wonder why such a great looking place is virtually empty.
I mean Marlon no ill will, the poor guy needs help. But be warned, if you pay to join, you could end up losing your money for no good reason. At least not a reason that makes any sense to you.
Showing posts with label Second Life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Second Life. Show all posts
Sunday, 26 October 2014
Tuesday, 23 July 2013
Wednesday, 17 July 2013
Thursday, 4 April 2013
Wednesday, 28 November 2012
Monday, 5 November 2012
James Bond party
 |
| In my latex cat suit with the golden gun replica made for me out of mesh my Linn. |
 |
| Linn dancing in a glass in opening credits style. |
 |
| Becca as dead golden girl |
Thursday, 25 October 2012
Making time
Puzzling
[03:47:46] dominique: hello Miss
[03:48:19] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): Hello dear
[03:48:38] dominique: you have a good look Miss
[03:49:28] dominique: Miss, you seek a slave?
[03:49:38] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): Isn't dominique a girls name?
[03:50:28] dominique: women and male
[03:50:58] dominique: i have no limite Miss
[03:51:06] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): I do
[03:52:30] dominique: okey.. good day Miss
[04:00:29] dominique: i think you are not a Mistress
[04:01:20] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): I'm sorry darling, you seem to have mistaken me for somebody who gives a shit.
[04:03:24] dominique: wouaa !! you have a problème, bye
And my problem is.....?
[03:48:19] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): Hello dear
[03:48:38] dominique: you have a good look Miss
[03:49:28] dominique: Miss, you seek a slave?
[03:49:38] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): Isn't dominique a girls name?
[03:50:28] dominique: women and male
[03:50:58] dominique: i have no limite Miss
[03:51:06] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): I do
[03:52:30] dominique: okey.. good day Miss
[04:00:29] dominique: i think you are not a Mistress
[04:01:20] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): I'm sorry darling, you seem to have mistaken me for somebody who gives a shit.
[04:03:24] dominique: wouaa !! you have a problème, bye
And my problem is.....?
Monday, 8 October 2012
In my email
 |
| From Nina while I was at work ~ "just a big baby and a statue wanting there owner. =^.^=" |
 |
| From Becca while I was sleeping ~ "figured I would help around the house.. :)" |
.
Monday, 23 July 2012
Atheism disscussion in Second Life.
Following a chat with people near and dear to me about religion... here are some sources which put iron in my words.
Firstly, why bother? Angry at god?
No, if I get angry it is because religion kills people, religious people make decisions which effect me, and you. If I'm angry, I have good reason, not nearly as much reason as many of the people I know in SL should have.
The list of things to be angry about starts at 6:00
Why Are You Atheists So Angry? Greta Christina Skepticon 4
As for the idea that Jesus was angel who was believed in by some pre-Christian Jews... Richard Carrier mentions it here [16:07]. Unfortunately he cites his own book for the citations-- which i don't have. And I have not been able to find any reference to it elsewhere. In fact it is usually said that Philo of Alexandria never mentions Jesus. So I'd would love to see some discussion between scholars about this. But If Carrier says it, there is probably a discussion to be had.
Richard Carrier: The Historicity of Jesus
As for Hitler and the Nazis, Christians used to be scared of the occult, so they labeled him an oculist. Now they are terrified of Atheists so they call him an Atheist. It is indisputable he was Catholic. The writings of Martin Luther obviously had more impact that folkish paganism.
Hitler: The Atheist
By the way, Christians are also blaming Nazism on Darwin and Evolution. But in Hitler's own words he seems to have been against Evolution and a proponent of Intelligent Design.
As for nasty stuff in the bible, there is no end of it in the Old Testament, but what would Jesus do?
So... until heaven and earth disappear, until the rapture, old testament law stands, every pen-stroke of it...
...that includes the hating on gays, rules on masturbation, prohibition on shell fish and pork, prohibition on wearing mixed fabrics, rules on slavery, idol worship, etc.
Are we sure? I mean is that what he meant? Even the nasty stuff about stoning children to death?
But surely Jesus loves all the little children... If I was going to start a religion, the first rule I would put in would be the protection of children!
Oh, I see. We are supposed to abandon our children. How silly of me. This is probably because whoever made up this nonsense thought that the world was about to end.
Sounds abusive to me. But then the new testament is infinitely worse than any of the rape and slaughter of the old testament. It introduces an entirely new concept, the idea that the only way to find salvation is blind unquestioning devotion to Jesus, the ONLY alternative to this is eternal torture. I'm not sure I could really condone torture under any circumstances, but for eternity? Not much of a choice is it.
Fred Phelps and his family are doing it right. They know and understand the bible, they don't just cherry-pick the bits they like, or that suit them. Their views are entirely consistent with what the bible actually says. The reason they seem bat-shit crazy is that the bible is a bat-shit crazy book of hateful bad ideas.
Talk to me about biblical morality? This is a set of rules that say that rapists have to marry their victims, and you can be stoned to death for picking up sticks on the wrong day.
It is a book where Jesus has tantrums and murders fig trees for being out of season and where god sends bears to kill children. A book of talking donkeys in a flat world with a metal sky. Fairy stories which have no place being used as a standard by which to judge modern life.
Okay, slightly less relevant, here is a 'quick and dirty' overview of the historicity of Jesus which mentions Jesus of Pandera, who I think could have been an attempt to make a mythical Jesus human in order to kill him as a heretic.
David Fitzgerald ~ Examining he Existence of Jesus
...and professor Hector Avolos (Starts at 2:35) continued here
Hector Avalos: How Archeology Killed Biblical History
And Dr. Robert Price
Firstly, why bother? Angry at god?
No, if I get angry it is because religion kills people, religious people make decisions which effect me, and you. If I'm angry, I have good reason, not nearly as much reason as many of the people I know in SL should have.
The list of things to be angry about starts at 6:00
Why Are You Atheists So Angry? Greta Christina Skepticon 4
As for the idea that Jesus was angel who was believed in by some pre-Christian Jews... Richard Carrier mentions it here [16:07]. Unfortunately he cites his own book for the citations-- which i don't have. And I have not been able to find any reference to it elsewhere. In fact it is usually said that Philo of Alexandria never mentions Jesus. So I'd would love to see some discussion between scholars about this. But If Carrier says it, there is probably a discussion to be had.
Richard Carrier: The Historicity of Jesus
As for Hitler and the Nazis, Christians used to be scared of the occult, so they labeled him an oculist. Now they are terrified of Atheists so they call him an Atheist. It is indisputable he was Catholic. The writings of Martin Luther obviously had more impact that folkish paganism.
Hitler: The Atheist
By the way, Christians are also blaming Nazism on Darwin and Evolution. But in Hitler's own words he seems to have been against Evolution and a proponent of Intelligent Design.
As for nasty stuff in the bible, there is no end of it in the Old Testament, but what would Jesus do?
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."
I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."
So... until heaven and earth disappear, until the rapture, old testament law stands, every pen-stroke of it...
...that includes the hating on gays, rules on masturbation, prohibition on shell fish and pork, prohibition on wearing mixed fabrics, rules on slavery, idol worship, etc.
Are we sure? I mean is that what he meant? Even the nasty stuff about stoning children to death?
You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men.
And he said to them: "You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions!
For Moses said, 'Honor your father and your mother,' and, 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.'"
But surely Jesus loves all the little children... If I was going to start a religion, the first rule I would put in would be the protection of children!
And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.
Oh, I see. We are supposed to abandon our children. How silly of me. This is probably because whoever made up this nonsense thought that the world was about to end.
“Don't imagine that I came to bring peace on earth! No, rather a sword lf you love your father, mother, sister, brother, more than me, you are not worthy of being mine.“
Sounds abusive to me. But then the new testament is infinitely worse than any of the rape and slaughter of the old testament. It introduces an entirely new concept, the idea that the only way to find salvation is blind unquestioning devotion to Jesus, the ONLY alternative to this is eternal torture. I'm not sure I could really condone torture under any circumstances, but for eternity? Not much of a choice is it.
Fred Phelps and his family are doing it right. They know and understand the bible, they don't just cherry-pick the bits they like, or that suit them. Their views are entirely consistent with what the bible actually says. The reason they seem bat-shit crazy is that the bible is a bat-shit crazy book of hateful bad ideas.
Talk to me about biblical morality? This is a set of rules that say that rapists have to marry their victims, and you can be stoned to death for picking up sticks on the wrong day.
It is a book where Jesus has tantrums and murders fig trees for being out of season and where god sends bears to kill children. A book of talking donkeys in a flat world with a metal sky. Fairy stories which have no place being used as a standard by which to judge modern life.
Okay, slightly less relevant, here is a 'quick and dirty' overview of the historicity of Jesus which mentions Jesus of Pandera, who I think could have been an attempt to make a mythical Jesus human in order to kill him as a heretic.
David Fitzgerald ~ Examining he Existence of Jesus
...and professor Hector Avolos (Starts at 2:35) continued here
Hector Avalos: How Archeology Killed Biblical History
And Dr. Robert Price
Saturday, 14 July 2012
Thursday, 12 July 2012
Political Correctness gone mad
[14:36:25] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): sooo Never?
[14:36:29] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): your a fairy?
[14:36:30] Never Sieyes: yes?
[14:36:33] Never Sieyes: nope
[14:36:37] Never Sieyes: i can be tho
[14:37:05] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): talk about the pot calling the kettle black
[14:37:11] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): omg
[14:37:15] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): evil vicks!
[14:37:40] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): vicky and kovu have a tendancy to make me say stuff that come back to BITE me
Edited for clarity.
[14:36:29] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): your a fairy?
[14:36:30] Never Sieyes: yes?
[14:36:33] Never Sieyes: nope
[14:36:37] Never Sieyes: i can be tho
[14:37:05] νicky Caramel (vinny.caramel): talk about the pot calling the kettle black
[14:37:11] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): omg
[14:37:15] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): evil vicks!
[14:37:40] 乙σ Aυяуη (zornnorseman): vicky and kovu have a tendancy to make me say stuff that come back to BITE me
Edited for clarity.
Monday, 9 July 2012
Trolling fail
-- Instant message logging enabled --
[10:00:06] Miss Christel (christel7): seen your site; sorry yuo are fat and i hate that
[10:00:24] Miss Christel (christel7): ugly as welll
[10:00:28] Miss Christel (christel7): ejoy sl
[10:01:03] Vinny Caramel: haha
[10:01:21] Miss Christel (christel7): get lost fat jady you look horrible
[10:01:29] Miss Christel (christel7): muted ugly woman
I suppose I brought it on myself posting that I am done with Sissies. I suspect I'll now get abuse from random female impersonators from time-to-time... at least that is the only reason I can think of for this ill-thought-out attempt at trolling me. Unless it's jealousy, or an attempt at Domme Breaking?
Anyway, I post it here for your amusement.
[10:00:06] Miss Christel (christel7): seen your site; sorry yuo are fat and i hate that
[10:00:24] Miss Christel (christel7): ugly as welll
[10:00:28] Miss Christel (christel7): ejoy sl
[10:01:03] Vinny Caramel: haha
[10:01:21] Miss Christel (christel7): get lost fat jady you look horrible
[10:01:29] Miss Christel (christel7): muted ugly woman
I suppose I brought it on myself posting that I am done with Sissies. I suspect I'll now get abuse from random female impersonators from time-to-time... at least that is the only reason I can think of for this ill-thought-out attempt at trolling me. Unless it's jealousy, or an attempt at Domme Breaking?
Anyway, I post it here for your amusement.
Sunday, 8 July 2012
I'm done with sissies
If you are a sissy, the answer is 'No, I will not be your friend'.
It's nothing personal, you are probably a lovely guy... but I'm prejudiced.
The word prejudice means to pre-judge, and based on past experience it makes complete sense for me to assume that if you are a sissy you will follow this pattern of of behaviour:-
1. Beg me to be their Mistress.
2. Ask to be friends anyway.
3. Beg me to be your Mistress and hang around as if I was.
4. Sulk.
5. Drop hints that your want me to be your Mistress.
6. Sulk some more.
7. Ask me what I would do with you if I were their Mistress.
6. Drop more hints that your want me to be their Mistress.
8. Ask me to set you some tasks.
9. Not do the tasks, presumably because the tasks weren't sexual in nature.
10. Ask me repeatedly why I don't take sissies.
11. Sulk.
12. Ask me If I can help find a Mistress.
13. Pester me for more tasks.
14. Ask my advice on finding a Mistress.
15. Ingnore my advice.
16. Ask me if I have friends that might be a Mistress.
17. Ask me to describe in detail what I do with my girls.
18. Whine and complain.
19. Make bitchy comments.
20. Ask me repeatedly why I don't take sissies.
21. Offer excuses when I offer suggestions about how to find a mistress.
22. Then either ignore me when it becomes apparent I will never be their Mistress, or throw a hissy fit.
On past experience, sissies seem incapable of being friends. They are just trying to get a foot in the door, they use you without offering anything in return. They are completely pathetic, moody, lacking in humour and a complete waste of space. They also tend toward bitterness, paranoia and a persecution complex. They are relentless in their pestering, their demands and they drag me down.
...and they wonder why they can't find a Mistress?
Oh sure, there are exceptions. I have known Dominant sissies that are great, I know cross dressers and transgendered who are not really sissies and play women, no problem. But if I play the odds, I'm not going to allow sissies into my Second Life.
I'm playing the odds, so don't blame me, blame all the other sissies that have acted like complete cunts.
I'll add one more thing ~ I do like men! But I'm not here for men. If I was here for men, I'd be interested in men that act like men, not men who what to dress in pink frilly stuff and act pathetic. I find nothing remotely attractive about sissies.
So please, don't even try. And if you are wondering why you can't find a Mistress, read my words and ask yourself if it applies to you.
I am aware of the irony in this. I have previously complained about the fact that most women looking for a Mistress are actually men. I don't actually have any problem with with men pretending to be women (so long as they don't try to take me for a ride), it's okay if they do a decent job of acting like women because I like women as a rule. But sissies act like pathetic men. I dislike pathetic people of any gender.
It's nothing personal, you are probably a lovely guy... but I'm prejudiced.
The word prejudice means to pre-judge, and based on past experience it makes complete sense for me to assume that if you are a sissy you will follow this pattern of of behaviour:-
1. Beg me to be their Mistress.
2. Ask to be friends anyway.
3. Beg me to be your Mistress and hang around as if I was.
4. Sulk.
5. Drop hints that your want me to be your Mistress.
6. Sulk some more.
7. Ask me what I would do with you if I were their Mistress.
6. Drop more hints that your want me to be their Mistress.
8. Ask me to set you some tasks.
9. Not do the tasks, presumably because the tasks weren't sexual in nature.
10. Ask me repeatedly why I don't take sissies.
11. Sulk.
12. Ask me If I can help find a Mistress.
13. Pester me for more tasks.
14. Ask my advice on finding a Mistress.
15. Ingnore my advice.
16. Ask me if I have friends that might be a Mistress.
17. Ask me to describe in detail what I do with my girls.
18. Whine and complain.
19. Make bitchy comments.
20. Ask me repeatedly why I don't take sissies.
21. Offer excuses when I offer suggestions about how to find a mistress.
22. Then either ignore me when it becomes apparent I will never be their Mistress, or throw a hissy fit.
On past experience, sissies seem incapable of being friends. They are just trying to get a foot in the door, they use you without offering anything in return. They are completely pathetic, moody, lacking in humour and a complete waste of space. They also tend toward bitterness, paranoia and a persecution complex. They are relentless in their pestering, their demands and they drag me down.
...and they wonder why they can't find a Mistress?
Oh sure, there are exceptions. I have known Dominant sissies that are great, I know cross dressers and transgendered who are not really sissies and play women, no problem. But if I play the odds, I'm not going to allow sissies into my Second Life.
I'm playing the odds, so don't blame me, blame all the other sissies that have acted like complete cunts.
I'll add one more thing ~ I do like men! But I'm not here for men. If I was here for men, I'd be interested in men that act like men, not men who what to dress in pink frilly stuff and act pathetic. I find nothing remotely attractive about sissies.
So please, don't even try. And if you are wondering why you can't find a Mistress, read my words and ask yourself if it applies to you.
I am aware of the irony in this. I have previously complained about the fact that most women looking for a Mistress are actually men. I don't actually have any problem with with men pretending to be women (so long as they don't try to take me for a ride), it's okay if they do a decent job of acting like women because I like women as a rule. But sissies act like pathetic men. I dislike pathetic people of any gender.
Thursday, 5 July 2012
Dangerous people! (and how to guard against them).
I'm sure we have seen on the news about on-line pedophile rings, and how there are dozens of them worldwide, and how they get children to do stuff... and more recently how they get women to play along and do their bidding.
I have always wondered about this. I don't wonder how they groom women to end up doing despicable things they wouldn't have dreamed of at the beginning. Thats actually no great mystery, they use people's natural commitment to consistency, to lead them in, they normalize, they allow them to justify... it's pretty much how cults work.
No, what I always wondered is how these pedophiles find each other? They can't exactly advertise it openly. I doubt there is some form of secret handshake either, or handkerchief in the back pocket. Any such signal or sign would soon be known. They must just be able to spot each other maybe? No, that makes no sense, if you could spot a pedophile we could develop a test.
So I always wondered how they meet and find each other because during my time on the internet I have seen very little which is suspicious.
I need wonder no more!
I had a very creepy conversation with somebody the other day, they started talking to me, and the conversation strayed into RL stuff... and frankly, the conversation stayed completely kosher, because I am completely kosher. But it could have so easily have gone bad. It ended up with me getting a load of "What would you do in my situation" type questions. If I had said, "You know, thats kinda hot" instead of "Oh poor you, you can't allow that", I strongly suspect they would have agreed.
...but I could be wrong. And thats the fucking point! Taken on face value, it was a completely innocent conversation!
I never take things at face value, I always look for a subtext. I'm good at it, it's why I can be a Domme and in this case I assume the worst and I strongly suspect that I was being probed by a pedophile.
But there is NOTHING for me to hang this on. The person concerned could completely deny it. If fact, they don't have to even completely deny it... they could say, "So what? I was fishing for roleplay. I have incest fantasies, I was too embarrassed to mention it straight out".
It's true... incest fantasy is extremely common, as is rape fantasy, mother/daughter, father/son... just look how many groups there are with names like, Legal Teens for Older Men, Young Sluts for Cougars, Filthy School Girls... yadda, yadda, yadda. Not to mention Adult Baby sitting services and a whole grey area which is near the knuckle (which is the point) but essentially harmless.
So what was different about this?
Firstly it was purely talking about Real Life. Secondly, If I'm right about them, I don't think they wanted anything from me except a confederate. They were not trying to groom be to be their victim, they were testing me to see if I was like them!
That is the really scary part. I could freak out, question why they picked on me, wonder if I give off a pedophile vibe, but I won't. The simple fact is that I'm a Mommy Domme. At the time I was in a place where I was showing out as a Domme for older and younger people into BDSM. So if a nonce is going go fishing anywhere...
What is scary is that pedophiles are predators. And I was never in any danger of being prey. They were testing me to see if I was like they are. If that is how they talk to a Domme, how do they talk to subs? This person was kinda smart, charming, humble, open, I could see how they could with enough time, be very manipulative.
It's worrying, but frankly there is nothing I can do. All I have is, "That person gives me a bad vibe, I would treat them with caution". And saying that makes me look bad, as I found out earlier.
So there is no dilemma, I'm powerless. Short of going in undercover, possibly for months... there is nothing I can do but walk away and try and forget about it.
...there is just one thing I can do, that is remind you that there are nasty people out there. You have to be careful.
How do you be careful? How about 'never give them your personal information so they can't find you', how about simple rules like that?
No, thats no good!
I'll tell you why, firstly because relying on rules like that give you a false sense of security, especially as finding where you live is not what they are after. You are guarding against the wrong thing. And besides, if you have ever seen somebody like Darren Brown, you will realize that it is easy enough to trick people into giving them little parts of the puzzle over time.
What you really need to guard against is being slowly sucked in. You may think you are too smart for that... but actually, it is the dumb people who are harder to sucker. Smart principled people are far better easier to manipulate, and they are far better at making up excuses for themselves.
Yeah really! It's why cults are full of smart people.
But what cults also do is cut people off from their families and friends. This is because friends and family are normal and grounded in reality. They are a stark contrast the craziness. They don't even need to tell you you are being a loony, they stand as an example.
There is safety in numbers. Have one, two maybe even three friends that you tell everything to. Listen to their judgment because they won't be there getting suckered in with you, they won't hear all the smooth talk. But they will take an overview and tell you you are being crazy.
If you don't have friends you can talk to, imagine you do. Imagine I'm your friend, (if you are reading this I probably am). Would you be comfortable confiding in me what you just did... without explanation or justification or excuses? If you straight up told me what you just did, would I tell you you are crazy or sick?
I like to play into RL and I ask girls to do some pretty outrageous things, I even do a few outrageous things myself... but nobody gets hurt, and I ensure everybody stays safe and legal. More importantly, even though I keep my girl's secrets, they don't have to. They can tell whoever they like, I'm proud of what I do. Would I be happy saying what I do into a group chat? Sure.
***
This doesn't deserve a separate blog post ~ if you come up to me and tell me that smoking is bad for my health... seriously, what kind of reaction are you expecting. Do you think I will laugh and hug you?
Expect me to take an instant dislike to you.
I have always wondered about this. I don't wonder how they groom women to end up doing despicable things they wouldn't have dreamed of at the beginning. Thats actually no great mystery, they use people's natural commitment to consistency, to lead them in, they normalize, they allow them to justify... it's pretty much how cults work.
No, what I always wondered is how these pedophiles find each other? They can't exactly advertise it openly. I doubt there is some form of secret handshake either, or handkerchief in the back pocket. Any such signal or sign would soon be known. They must just be able to spot each other maybe? No, that makes no sense, if you could spot a pedophile we could develop a test.
So I always wondered how they meet and find each other because during my time on the internet I have seen very little which is suspicious.
I need wonder no more!
I had a very creepy conversation with somebody the other day, they started talking to me, and the conversation strayed into RL stuff... and frankly, the conversation stayed completely kosher, because I am completely kosher. But it could have so easily have gone bad. It ended up with me getting a load of "What would you do in my situation" type questions. If I had said, "You know, thats kinda hot" instead of "Oh poor you, you can't allow that", I strongly suspect they would have agreed.
...but I could be wrong. And thats the fucking point! Taken on face value, it was a completely innocent conversation!
I never take things at face value, I always look for a subtext. I'm good at it, it's why I can be a Domme and in this case I assume the worst and I strongly suspect that I was being probed by a pedophile.
But there is NOTHING for me to hang this on. The person concerned could completely deny it. If fact, they don't have to even completely deny it... they could say, "So what? I was fishing for roleplay. I have incest fantasies, I was too embarrassed to mention it straight out".
It's true... incest fantasy is extremely common, as is rape fantasy, mother/daughter, father/son... just look how many groups there are with names like, Legal Teens for Older Men, Young Sluts for Cougars, Filthy School Girls... yadda, yadda, yadda. Not to mention Adult Baby sitting services and a whole grey area which is near the knuckle (which is the point) but essentially harmless.
So what was different about this?
Firstly it was purely talking about Real Life. Secondly, If I'm right about them, I don't think they wanted anything from me except a confederate. They were not trying to groom be to be their victim, they were testing me to see if I was like them!
That is the really scary part. I could freak out, question why they picked on me, wonder if I give off a pedophile vibe, but I won't. The simple fact is that I'm a Mommy Domme. At the time I was in a place where I was showing out as a Domme for older and younger people into BDSM. So if a nonce is going go fishing anywhere...
What is scary is that pedophiles are predators. And I was never in any danger of being prey. They were testing me to see if I was like they are. If that is how they talk to a Domme, how do they talk to subs? This person was kinda smart, charming, humble, open, I could see how they could with enough time, be very manipulative.
It's worrying, but frankly there is nothing I can do. All I have is, "That person gives me a bad vibe, I would treat them with caution". And saying that makes me look bad, as I found out earlier.
So there is no dilemma, I'm powerless. Short of going in undercover, possibly for months... there is nothing I can do but walk away and try and forget about it.
...there is just one thing I can do, that is remind you that there are nasty people out there. You have to be careful.
How do you be careful? How about 'never give them your personal information so they can't find you', how about simple rules like that?
No, thats no good!
I'll tell you why, firstly because relying on rules like that give you a false sense of security, especially as finding where you live is not what they are after. You are guarding against the wrong thing. And besides, if you have ever seen somebody like Darren Brown, you will realize that it is easy enough to trick people into giving them little parts of the puzzle over time.
What you really need to guard against is being slowly sucked in. You may think you are too smart for that... but actually, it is the dumb people who are harder to sucker. Smart principled people are far better easier to manipulate, and they are far better at making up excuses for themselves.
Yeah really! It's why cults are full of smart people.
But what cults also do is cut people off from their families and friends. This is because friends and family are normal and grounded in reality. They are a stark contrast the craziness. They don't even need to tell you you are being a loony, they stand as an example.
There is safety in numbers. Have one, two maybe even three friends that you tell everything to. Listen to their judgment because they won't be there getting suckered in with you, they won't hear all the smooth talk. But they will take an overview and tell you you are being crazy.
If you don't have friends you can talk to, imagine you do. Imagine I'm your friend, (if you are reading this I probably am). Would you be comfortable confiding in me what you just did... without explanation or justification or excuses? If you straight up told me what you just did, would I tell you you are crazy or sick?
I like to play into RL and I ask girls to do some pretty outrageous things, I even do a few outrageous things myself... but nobody gets hurt, and I ensure everybody stays safe and legal. More importantly, even though I keep my girl's secrets, they don't have to. They can tell whoever they like, I'm proud of what I do. Would I be happy saying what I do into a group chat? Sure.
***
This doesn't deserve a separate blog post ~ if you come up to me and tell me that smoking is bad for my health... seriously, what kind of reaction are you expecting. Do you think I will laugh and hug you?
Expect me to take an instant dislike to you.
Friday, 29 June 2012
Pee-Play ~ You know it makes sense!
At last, an interesting subject... water sports! Yes I'm going to give my opinions about girls who piss on each other. For many it is a limit, but in my experience, it is par-for-the-course with the kind of girls that I adore.
Vicky Porn
Somebody was telling me how they enjoyed my blogs and said they had seen the pictures (long pause).
I told her that the photos serve many purposes. For example, they show that women of all shapes and sizes can be beautiful, sexy and attractive. They also show examples of many fetishes, they show they are nothing too unusual, nothing to be afraid of, that they can also be beautiful, fun, and erotic. This includes Pee-Play.
I did think about showing you an example of such a photo in this post... but I would much prefer you go looking for yourself, you will find many amazing images on the journey.
So the person I was talking to said that she supposed it was okay, apart from the smell. I had to point out that the kind of girl who likes it usually has a thing for armpits, feet, fresh sweat, and smells in general and likes the odour (as long as it is fresh and not too strong - drink plenty of water if you are trying this at home kids).
I continued by saying the smell was rather the point of the whole thing, it is what explains it. And of all fetishes this was perhaps the the most natural and easiest to explain. Hence the title of this entry, it can be made sense of.
If I'm going to explain it, I may as well do it here.
Kink leads to emotions
I try to understand all fetishes, which generally boil down to how they make the person engaged in them feel. In the circles in which I move, which is with dolls, statues, mannequins and various objectification fetishes, there is a feeling of safety and security, belonging, being needed, which leads to esteem... essentially you can work your way up the Maslow's hierarchy.
[Oh yeah, some would nag me to say, it isn't a fetish or a kink, it is a lifestyle. I would say, 'Cobblers!'. Lifestyle and kink aren't mutually exclusive. The same kinds of motivations apply, even in fandom which is far harder to rationalize.]
And within the exact same group of fetishes, depending on how you play it, you can also have the same excitement you get from loss of inhibition that you get from other forms of D/s, because the sub isn't in control.
This part involves emotion in a more obvious way, it isn't hard to imagine the sense of freedom coupled with a little bit of fear... but as it turns out, all that other good stuff involves emotions too. In recent years scientists have measured brain activity in people doing various tasks and it turns out things like 'certainty' are actually emotions. So a feeling of security isn't just an absence of negative feelings, it is actually something positive which gives you a real feeling, which some people crave far more than mere sexual thrill.
Emotive language and trigger words
Obviously, I seek and I attract certain kinds of girls so I see this often. But I would be remiss if I didn't mention the thrill of pushing limits and breaking taboos. As a Mommy Domme, it's not unusual for girls to want to call me 'Mommy' or 'Mamma'. There is no age-play involved, and no overt incest-play, I'm sure of this because I'm the one in control, I know where things are going... yet I get a thrill being called 'Mommy', probably because it is slightly taboo. But is that all? There was an experiment (which I can't be bothered to find and cite) which was designed to measure the influence of positive and negative emotions on decision making. The words used to induce the moods were 'lung cancer' and 'Mother's love' -- the result of the experiment were a significant influence. Although just words, they instantly tap into something very real and almost universal concepts, an unstoppable enemy and your most trusted ally.
It is very easy to imagine that using 'Mommy' is a powerful trigger for a whole set of emotions and natural feelings.
Breaking a Taboo
Which brings us around to pee-play. Why would anybody want to play with piss? The most obvious answer is that it is taboo. I'm sure there are those that do only do it because the taboo gives them a thrill when the thrill of other kinky things has faded. There is certainly a thrill from the taboo with everybody I know who has done it.
I suppose at this point I should remind readers that I am not really talking about doing this in SL by jumping on a pose ball and spraying particles. I am a remote Domme, I do set real life tasks with real life urine... I have had girls piss in a bucket, I have had them wet themselves in private and in public, drink pee, bathe in pee, sit talking to me for periods of time wearing pee soaked clothing. I must also add that I only do this with girls who have an interest in it. I should also probably admit that it isn't a particular kink of mine, but I really do share in the intimacy and enjoyment my girls get from the experience.
I also should note that as this is remote, it has it's limitations and both parties take what they can get. Obviously there are different aspects to this in the fantasies of the sub. Either being made to pee, do things with their own pee. Or having the desire to be peed on. The latter is the most desired and is Role-Played, but only the former is practical in a remote domination relationship. So there is not point in me differentiating.
Dirty little secret
But long before actually doing anything SL or RL, the taboo element comes into play when the matter is discussed between sub and Domme. Because of the nature of the subject, the sub has often never discussed it with another living soul. Some of them have discussed it, and even RP'd it, but doing it RL is a whole other prospect, and the admission that they are willing, or even have the desire to do it is something special. This makes it a very powerful moment in D/s for furthering trust. It isn't often that you get to share a secret that has never been shared before, there are actually very few things as intimate as sharing a secret like this, and being able to offer acceptance and understanding (even if it is agreed there will not be acted on) is another extremely positive element.
I have already discussed how those subs that are into variants of objectification receive comfort and a sense of belonging from having things done to them beyond their control on their owner's whim. So it becomes understandable that being pissed on is just a continuation of this. I have also mentioned taboo.
I haven't mentioned 'fun' and being naughty, nor have I mentioned humiliation -- both could come into play depending on how you decide to play this game. This article is long enough already so I won't go into these subjects, nor will I go into nappy-play (diapers), catheters, public or outdoor pissing, voyeurism, pissing off balconies or making somebody act out being a stone fountain! I will just say that if you have ever seen any pee-play pornography... well, you know pornography is seldom a good blueprint.
It's perfectly natural
Finally, I propose that there is something very natural about this. The first time I role-played it, I went into it expecting to have to hold down my dinner. I came out of it feeling something very beautiful and incredibly intimate had happened (It was played very affectionately). I gave it a great deal of thought... somebody had mentioned that it was similar to a dog marking it's territory, but as the Alpha in the situation I really didn't feel this rung true and dismissed it. That is until one day my husband smacked the dog for pissing on the bathroom floor, and the dog responded by shitting in his bed.
Yes I know, this story isn't getting sexy, but I remembered that when we first adopted our cat she did the same thing, so I did some research into why dogs and cats do this, what I found was very interesting and I'm sure relevant, because the family pet is usually the most submissive in the household and they do this when they are feeling insecure.
Charles Darwin and Pee-Play
Why? Well, being submissive is a good evolutionary strategy. People tend to think of being submissive as being the weakest, but rather than pushing you to the margins of the group where it can get dangerous, it brings you right up close to the Alpha. After all it is the Alpha you are submissive too. And while in proximity there is the greater chance of mating with the Alpha. As Alpha's often tend to get usurped, and if not killed, then pushed out of the group, you could actually argue that a sub has the best seat in the house, because when this happens, the sub stays where they are becoming submissive to the new Alpha.
It is at this point that it probably pays for the sub to smell like the new Alpha and not like the old Alpha.
Or... if the new Alpha smells like the sub, it would serve much the same purpose. It might be nice if the sub could get the Alpha to 'mark' him/her, but the sub has very little control over that. They can however piss where the Alpha sleeps and guarantee the Alpha smells like the sub.
What is the advantage of this again? Well assuming that the main threat is not outside predators but usurpers either within the group, or coming into the group, or from other groups, they they are going to want to pick their moment. Modern humans have hospitals, but otherwise an injury from a fight is likely to lead to death, so a usurper really does want to pick the fights they know they are going to win. Any uncertainty is going to put them off, so they are not going to pick on another that kinda smells a bit like the Alpha in case it is the Alpha. And if they are ready to pick on the Alpha, their best chance is one-on-one, so if there is a little retinue of 5-6 that all smell like the Alpha this probably isn't your moment.
In short it does make some sense for subs to smell like their Alpha, and for Alphas to smell like their subs.
[Edit] You could actually describe this more literally with words like 'blending' or 'merging' their odours, which is interesting. Because if you can get a sub to open up and give voice to their urges, and really try to explain what they feel, several have told me that they want to melt-into and merge with their Domme. To lose their own identity and just become a part of their owner. I find the concept of 'identity' very important in D/s and of course in a less evolved form, before concepts like names, smell would have served that purpose.
I know what your thinking, humans don't have a sense of smell that good, especially men, Alpha or otherwise. This is true now... but if a man has to pee outdoors, he finds a tree or a post to pee against doesn't he? Why is that?
In summary, if there are born leaders, there are probably born followers. And it is quite likely that in both there are latent instincts to do things that once had more utility than they do in our current state of evolution. So if you find your sub pissing in your bed, give them a hug and roll around in it because they are probably feeling insecure.
Go on, give it a go!
No actually don't. The simple fact is that I have never suggested to anybody that they try it, and nobody has ever said, "Yeah, never thought about it but I'll try anything once". At least not as I remember.
The girls who are into this have a desire to do it, an urge to do it, it is something they have fantasized about. And usually I can spot them because this falls in with a whole set of other kinks and behaviors which act as indicators. And this is why I think it is an inherent behaviour found within some people of a certain personality type.
Naturalistic fallacy
One form of the Appeal to Nature goes as follows:- "This behaviour is natural; therefore, this behaviour is morally acceptable" which is something that occurred to me while writing this. And it occurs to me that once on the interwebs anyone could stumble upon this with a wide range of prejudices and inhibitions. I believe that there is something inherent and natural, even social about pee-play, but this is my explanation for it not my justification. I don't think it needs justifying as morally acceptable as it doesn't hurt anybody and isn't being forced onto anybody who doesn't already like being forced to do stuff within the context of BDSM. If you don't like it, I suggest you don't do it. And if you don't do it, don't knock it until you have tried it.
Health issues
Urine is waste product, it contains plenty of stuff for bacteria to thrive on. But it is the bacteria that is icky and stinky, not the urine which is sterile (unless you have some heath problems. Saliva would be a bigger risk and that doesn't stop us from kissing!). In regards to smell, if you haven't worked it out yet, fresh urine doesn't smell the same as old urine. I have been told that the smell of fresh can get a sub quite excited while the same person will gag at the smell of stale. Some people insist that drinking urine is good for you... for which there is absolutely no evidence. But it's certainly not harmful, in fact it is so sterile and an army nurse told me that you can use it to wash wounds with. It does contain your body's waste products and a lot of water. The more hydrated you are when you pee, and more flushed out your system, the more dilute the waste is.
Cheers! Down the hatch!
For the record, it tastes just like water but with a bitter-metallic after-taste. Yes I have tasted it -- I would never ask a sub to do something I wouldn't do myself. That doesn't mean I have done everything I ask them to do, but I would if pushed. And in this case I thought I should have some experience. But drinking it is not actually necessary, certainly not obligatory... in fact it it might be a completely unrelated urge.
Oh shit!
Scat on the other hand probably is very much related... in case it crossed your mind. But we all have limits and... I don't want to think about it.
Give me a tinkle
If you have any comments, please feel free to make your views known. Unless it's about scat, I don't want to think about it.
tgp
Vicky Porn
Somebody was telling me how they enjoyed my blogs and said they had seen the pictures (long pause).
I told her that the photos serve many purposes. For example, they show that women of all shapes and sizes can be beautiful, sexy and attractive. They also show examples of many fetishes, they show they are nothing too unusual, nothing to be afraid of, that they can also be beautiful, fun, and erotic. This includes Pee-Play.
I did think about showing you an example of such a photo in this post... but I would much prefer you go looking for yourself, you will find many amazing images on the journey.
So the person I was talking to said that she supposed it was okay, apart from the smell. I had to point out that the kind of girl who likes it usually has a thing for armpits, feet, fresh sweat, and smells in general and likes the odour (as long as it is fresh and not too strong - drink plenty of water if you are trying this at home kids).
I continued by saying the smell was rather the point of the whole thing, it is what explains it. And of all fetishes this was perhaps the the most natural and easiest to explain. Hence the title of this entry, it can be made sense of.
If I'm going to explain it, I may as well do it here.
Kink leads to emotions
I try to understand all fetishes, which generally boil down to how they make the person engaged in them feel. In the circles in which I move, which is with dolls, statues, mannequins and various objectification fetishes, there is a feeling of safety and security, belonging, being needed, which leads to esteem... essentially you can work your way up the Maslow's hierarchy.
[Oh yeah, some would nag me to say, it isn't a fetish or a kink, it is a lifestyle. I would say, 'Cobblers!'. Lifestyle and kink aren't mutually exclusive. The same kinds of motivations apply, even in fandom which is far harder to rationalize.]
And within the exact same group of fetishes, depending on how you play it, you can also have the same excitement you get from loss of inhibition that you get from other forms of D/s, because the sub isn't in control.
This part involves emotion in a more obvious way, it isn't hard to imagine the sense of freedom coupled with a little bit of fear... but as it turns out, all that other good stuff involves emotions too. In recent years scientists have measured brain activity in people doing various tasks and it turns out things like 'certainty' are actually emotions. So a feeling of security isn't just an absence of negative feelings, it is actually something positive which gives you a real feeling, which some people crave far more than mere sexual thrill.
Emotive language and trigger words
Obviously, I seek and I attract certain kinds of girls so I see this often. But I would be remiss if I didn't mention the thrill of pushing limits and breaking taboos. As a Mommy Domme, it's not unusual for girls to want to call me 'Mommy' or 'Mamma'. There is no age-play involved, and no overt incest-play, I'm sure of this because I'm the one in control, I know where things are going... yet I get a thrill being called 'Mommy', probably because it is slightly taboo. But is that all? There was an experiment (which I can't be bothered to find and cite) which was designed to measure the influence of positive and negative emotions on decision making. The words used to induce the moods were 'lung cancer' and 'Mother's love' -- the result of the experiment were a significant influence. Although just words, they instantly tap into something very real and almost universal concepts, an unstoppable enemy and your most trusted ally.
It is very easy to imagine that using 'Mommy' is a powerful trigger for a whole set of emotions and natural feelings.
Breaking a Taboo
Which brings us around to pee-play. Why would anybody want to play with piss? The most obvious answer is that it is taboo. I'm sure there are those that do only do it because the taboo gives them a thrill when the thrill of other kinky things has faded. There is certainly a thrill from the taboo with everybody I know who has done it.
I suppose at this point I should remind readers that I am not really talking about doing this in SL by jumping on a pose ball and spraying particles. I am a remote Domme, I do set real life tasks with real life urine... I have had girls piss in a bucket, I have had them wet themselves in private and in public, drink pee, bathe in pee, sit talking to me for periods of time wearing pee soaked clothing. I must also add that I only do this with girls who have an interest in it. I should also probably admit that it isn't a particular kink of mine, but I really do share in the intimacy and enjoyment my girls get from the experience.
I also should note that as this is remote, it has it's limitations and both parties take what they can get. Obviously there are different aspects to this in the fantasies of the sub. Either being made to pee, do things with their own pee. Or having the desire to be peed on. The latter is the most desired and is Role-Played, but only the former is practical in a remote domination relationship. So there is not point in me differentiating.
Dirty little secret
But long before actually doing anything SL or RL, the taboo element comes into play when the matter is discussed between sub and Domme. Because of the nature of the subject, the sub has often never discussed it with another living soul. Some of them have discussed it, and even RP'd it, but doing it RL is a whole other prospect, and the admission that they are willing, or even have the desire to do it is something special. This makes it a very powerful moment in D/s for furthering trust. It isn't often that you get to share a secret that has never been shared before, there are actually very few things as intimate as sharing a secret like this, and being able to offer acceptance and understanding (even if it is agreed there will not be acted on) is another extremely positive element.
I have already discussed how those subs that are into variants of objectification receive comfort and a sense of belonging from having things done to them beyond their control on their owner's whim. So it becomes understandable that being pissed on is just a continuation of this. I have also mentioned taboo.
I haven't mentioned 'fun' and being naughty, nor have I mentioned humiliation -- both could come into play depending on how you decide to play this game. This article is long enough already so I won't go into these subjects, nor will I go into nappy-play (diapers), catheters, public or outdoor pissing, voyeurism, pissing off balconies or making somebody act out being a stone fountain! I will just say that if you have ever seen any pee-play pornography... well, you know pornography is seldom a good blueprint.
It's perfectly natural
Finally, I propose that there is something very natural about this. The first time I role-played it, I went into it expecting to have to hold down my dinner. I came out of it feeling something very beautiful and incredibly intimate had happened (It was played very affectionately). I gave it a great deal of thought... somebody had mentioned that it was similar to a dog marking it's territory, but as the Alpha in the situation I really didn't feel this rung true and dismissed it. That is until one day my husband smacked the dog for pissing on the bathroom floor, and the dog responded by shitting in his bed.
Yes I know, this story isn't getting sexy, but I remembered that when we first adopted our cat she did the same thing, so I did some research into why dogs and cats do this, what I found was very interesting and I'm sure relevant, because the family pet is usually the most submissive in the household and they do this when they are feeling insecure.
Charles Darwin and Pee-Play
Why? Well, being submissive is a good evolutionary strategy. People tend to think of being submissive as being the weakest, but rather than pushing you to the margins of the group where it can get dangerous, it brings you right up close to the Alpha. After all it is the Alpha you are submissive too. And while in proximity there is the greater chance of mating with the Alpha. As Alpha's often tend to get usurped, and if not killed, then pushed out of the group, you could actually argue that a sub has the best seat in the house, because when this happens, the sub stays where they are becoming submissive to the new Alpha.
It is at this point that it probably pays for the sub to smell like the new Alpha and not like the old Alpha.
Or... if the new Alpha smells like the sub, it would serve much the same purpose. It might be nice if the sub could get the Alpha to 'mark' him/her, but the sub has very little control over that. They can however piss where the Alpha sleeps and guarantee the Alpha smells like the sub.
What is the advantage of this again? Well assuming that the main threat is not outside predators but usurpers either within the group, or coming into the group, or from other groups, they they are going to want to pick their moment. Modern humans have hospitals, but otherwise an injury from a fight is likely to lead to death, so a usurper really does want to pick the fights they know they are going to win. Any uncertainty is going to put them off, so they are not going to pick on another that kinda smells a bit like the Alpha in case it is the Alpha. And if they are ready to pick on the Alpha, their best chance is one-on-one, so if there is a little retinue of 5-6 that all smell like the Alpha this probably isn't your moment.
In short it does make some sense for subs to smell like their Alpha, and for Alphas to smell like their subs.
[Edit] You could actually describe this more literally with words like 'blending' or 'merging' their odours, which is interesting. Because if you can get a sub to open up and give voice to their urges, and really try to explain what they feel, several have told me that they want to melt-into and merge with their Domme. To lose their own identity and just become a part of their owner. I find the concept of 'identity' very important in D/s and of course in a less evolved form, before concepts like names, smell would have served that purpose.
I know what your thinking, humans don't have a sense of smell that good, especially men, Alpha or otherwise. This is true now... but if a man has to pee outdoors, he finds a tree or a post to pee against doesn't he? Why is that?
In summary, if there are born leaders, there are probably born followers. And it is quite likely that in both there are latent instincts to do things that once had more utility than they do in our current state of evolution. So if you find your sub pissing in your bed, give them a hug and roll around in it because they are probably feeling insecure.
Go on, give it a go!
No actually don't. The simple fact is that I have never suggested to anybody that they try it, and nobody has ever said, "Yeah, never thought about it but I'll try anything once". At least not as I remember.
The girls who are into this have a desire to do it, an urge to do it, it is something they have fantasized about. And usually I can spot them because this falls in with a whole set of other kinks and behaviors which act as indicators. And this is why I think it is an inherent behaviour found within some people of a certain personality type.
Naturalistic fallacy
One form of the Appeal to Nature goes as follows:- "This behaviour is natural; therefore, this behaviour is morally acceptable" which is something that occurred to me while writing this. And it occurs to me that once on the interwebs anyone could stumble upon this with a wide range of prejudices and inhibitions. I believe that there is something inherent and natural, even social about pee-play, but this is my explanation for it not my justification. I don't think it needs justifying as morally acceptable as it doesn't hurt anybody and isn't being forced onto anybody who doesn't already like being forced to do stuff within the context of BDSM. If you don't like it, I suggest you don't do it. And if you don't do it, don't knock it until you have tried it.
Health issues
Urine is waste product, it contains plenty of stuff for bacteria to thrive on. But it is the bacteria that is icky and stinky, not the urine which is sterile (unless you have some heath problems. Saliva would be a bigger risk and that doesn't stop us from kissing!). In regards to smell, if you haven't worked it out yet, fresh urine doesn't smell the same as old urine. I have been told that the smell of fresh can get a sub quite excited while the same person will gag at the smell of stale. Some people insist that drinking urine is good for you... for which there is absolutely no evidence. But it's certainly not harmful, in fact it is so sterile and an army nurse told me that you can use it to wash wounds with. It does contain your body's waste products and a lot of water. The more hydrated you are when you pee, and more flushed out your system, the more dilute the waste is.
Cheers! Down the hatch!
For the record, it tastes just like water but with a bitter-metallic after-taste. Yes I have tasted it -- I would never ask a sub to do something I wouldn't do myself. That doesn't mean I have done everything I ask them to do, but I would if pushed. And in this case I thought I should have some experience. But drinking it is not actually necessary, certainly not obligatory... in fact it it might be a completely unrelated urge.
Oh shit!
Scat on the other hand probably is very much related... in case it crossed your mind. But we all have limits and... I don't want to think about it.
Give me a tinkle
If you have any comments, please feel free to make your views known. Unless it's about scat, I don't want to think about it.
tgp
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
Sticky Vicky
I'm not used to Linn giving me stick, and i certainly didn't mind. My baby girl made me this lovely stick which she made in Blender.
 |
| All but my first cane have been gifts, firmly establishing it as my trademark. I have had two made for me now (Thank you Lita), both have had big heavy knobs. Sorta club like. Whatever must they think of me? |
 |
| Initialed of course. Details. |
 |
| A lovely bit knob. |
Sunday, 10 June 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)